Showing posts with label dead original. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dead original. Show all posts
Thursday, 15 November 2018
Sunday, 15 April 2018
Thursday, 16 November 2017
Laughing at the spirits
http://www.e-flux.com/journal/36/61261/laughing-at-the-spirits-in-north-siberia-is-animism-being-taken-too-seriously/
Joking and other types of ridiculing discourses about spirits play a prominent role in the everyday life of hunters, but not because they entail resistance to or subversion of the dominant cosmological values of the sharing economy. Virtually all Yukaghirs ascribe to the spirit world and the demand sharing principle, and they regard both as immutable and morally just. However—and this is the key point—they are well aware that this system must never become total. For the Yukaghirs, this would stand for “death,” as it would give the spirits the moral right to consume them in a series of divine predatory attacks. To avoid this, hunters must constantly steer a difficult course between two moral realities, transcending the official animist rhetoric of respect and sharing through equally animistic forms of theft, seduction, and deception.
Joking and other types of ridiculing discourses about spirits play a prominent role in the everyday life of hunters, but not because they entail resistance to or subversion of the dominant cosmological values of the sharing economy. Virtually all Yukaghirs ascribe to the spirit world and the demand sharing principle, and they regard both as immutable and morally just. However—and this is the key point—they are well aware that this system must never become total. For the Yukaghirs, this would stand for “death,” as it would give the spirits the moral right to consume them in a series of divine predatory attacks. To avoid this, hunters must constantly steer a difficult course between two moral realities, transcending the official animist rhetoric of respect and sharing through equally animistic forms of theft, seduction, and deception.
Sunday, 6 March 2016
Friday, 6 February 2015
ghosting
Thursday, 7 August 2014
Tuesday, 10 June 2014
death assemblage
An assemblage of fossils of organisms that were not associated with one another during their lives. The remains were brought together after death, often by the action of currents.
Saturday, 8 June 2013
Boris Groys ///Art Workers: Between Utopia and the Archive
However, the internet has become not a place for the realization of
postmodern utopias, but their graveyard—as the museum became a graveyard
for modern utopias. Indeed, the most important aspect of the internet
is that it fundamentally changes the relationship between original and
copy, as described by Benjamin—and thus makes the anonymous process of
reproduction calculable and personalized. On the internet, every
free-floating signifier has an address. The deterritorializing data
flows become reterritorialized.

Google data servers
Walter Benjamin famously distinguished between the original, which is
defined through its “here and now,” and the copy, which is siteless,
topologically indeterminable, lacking a “here and now.” Contemporary
digital reproduction is by no means siteless, its circulation is not
topologically undetermined, and it does not present itself in the form
of a multiplicity as Benjamin described it. Every data file’s address on
the internet accords it a place. The same data file with a different
address is a different data file. Here the aura of originality is not
lost, but instead substituted by a different aura. On the internet, the
circulation of digital data produces not copies, but new originals. And
this circulation is perfectly traceable. Individual pieces of data are
never deterritorialized. Moreover, every internet image or text has not
only its specific unique place, but also its unique time of appearance.
The internet registers every moment when a certain piece of data is
clicked, liked, un-liked, transferred, or transformed. Accordingly, a
digital image cannot be merely copied (as an analogue, mechanically
reproducible image can) but always only newly staged or performed. And
every performance of a data file is dated and archived.
Boris Groys ///Art Workers: Between Utopia and the Archive
Google data servers
Boris Groys ///Art Workers: Between Utopia and the Archive
Labels:
benjamin,
dead original,
groys,
internets,
object,
sealed objects
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
“nonsensuous” similarity
“We must assume,” writes Walter
Benjamin, “that in the remote past
the processes considered imitable includ
ed those in the sky.” http://www.brianmassumi.com/textes/Archive%20of%20Experience.pdf
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
citation
In 1980, a full eight years after his first use of
the crosshatch motif, Johns received a postcard reproduction of Edvard
Munch's Between the Clock and the Bed (1940–42; Munch Museum,
Oslo). In this late self-portrait, Munch, near death, depicted himself
in his bedroom, standing in front of the open door to his studio; the
bright red and dark blue pattern of the bedspread is rendered in a
fashion markedly similar to Johns's crosshatches. Between 1980 and 1982,
Johns, inspired by the Munch work, made several drawings and two large
paintings based on the crosshatch motif. These works culminate in
Johns's monumental grisaille encaustic painting Between the Clock and the Bed. This picture is the last major independent articulation of the
crosshatch (as of this writing). Johns incorporated touches of red,
blue, yellow, green, ocher, pink, and purple, but the painting is
predominantly gray. For whatever reasons, Johns chose to end his
extended treatment of the crosshatch motif with this distillation in
gray.
Jasper Johns / Gray
Jasper Johns / Gray
Monday, 7 May 2012
i-borg / e-borg/ we-borg ...explaining pictures...
-->
'wie
man dem toten Hasen die Bilder erklärt’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4ZkR1X6s7E
Meyer,
Ursula. “How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare,” Art News, January, 1970. Based on conversations with Joseph Beuys:
In How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare,
Beuys covered his head with honey and gold-leaf, transforming himself into a
sculpture. He cradled the dead hare in his arms and took it “to the pictures
and I explained to him everything that was to be seen. I let him touch the
pictures with his paws and meanwhile talked to him about them… I explained them
to him because I do not really like explaining them to people. Of course there
is a shadow of truth in this. A hare comprehends more than many human beings
with their stubborn rationalism… I told him that he needed only to scan the
picture to understand what is really important about it. The hare probably
knows better than man that directions are important. You know the hare can turn
on a dime. And actually nothing else is involved.”
At the beginning of the performance Beuys
locked the gallery doors from the inside, leaving the gallery-goers outside.
They could observe the scene within only through the windows. With his head
entirely coated in honey and gold
leaf, he began to explain pictures to a dead hare. Whispering to the dead
animal on his arm in an apparent dialog, he processed through the exhibit from
artwork to artwork. Occasionally he would stop and return to the center of the
gallery, where he stepped over a dead fir tree that lay on the floor.[2]
After three hours the public was let into the room. Beuys sat upon a stool in
the entrance area with the hare on his arm and his back to the onlookers.
“For me the Hare is a symbol of
incarnation, which the hare really enacts- something a human can only do in
imagination. It burrows, building itself a home in the earth. Thus it
incarnates itself in the earth: that alone is important. So it seems to me.
Honey on my head of course has to do with thought. While humans do not have the
ability to produce honey, they do have the ability to think, to produce ideas.
Therefore the stale and morbid nature of thought is once again made living.
Honey is an undoubtedly living substance- human thoughts can also become alive.
On the other hand intellectualizing can be deadly to thought: one can talk
one's mind to death in politics or in academia.”
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
smock
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








